Friday, January 15, 2016

"So I have murdered Sybil Vane."


I find that Oliver Wilde's writing style is unique to the other novels I've read from the 1800s.  As seen with Jane Austen, her writing contains long, fluid sentences that have a variety of vocabulary that I struggle to understand.  The contrast between her and Wilde is that Wilde writes in more contemporary sentences.  His descriptions are very basic, very straight to the point.  His dialogue is the only part of the novel where the sentences become confusing, especially with the dialogue of Lord Henry.  The only real struggle with Lord Henry is that everything he says sounds like an iconic speech, and I feel like I need to mark each monologue he has.  For example, as if an American president at a rally, he says to Basil, "the basis of optimism is sheer terror.  We think that we are generous because we credit our neighbor with the possession of those virtues that are likely to be a benefit to us," (76).  Though that is what I find beautiful about the style Wilde uses to write, the fact that I find myself having to decipher his meaning and trying to pick and choose what is crucial to the story, and what is just white noise. 

Probably the most important stylistic devices Wilde uses are his allusions and motifs.  For one, as Sybil Vane is an actress in Shakespeare, there is a lot of allusion to his work.  As Dorian mourns for the death of Sybil, who appears to have committed suicide after Dorian broke off their engagement, Henry takes the time to describe how she was never truly alive because she never played herself.  "She was Desdemona one night, and Ophelia the other; that if she died as Juliet, she came to life as Imogen," (103).  As I spent an entire summer trapped in a dorm full of Shakespeare students, I tend to skip over these allusions as Wilde weaves them into his work with ease.  But the allusions he makes to Shakespeare and other playwrights, like Ford, Webster, and Tourneur, all helped to place Sybil and her death almost into a play.  As she was an actress, her life itself was simply "a strange lurid fragment from some Jacobean tragedy," (104). 

My favorite device though, is Wilde's use of motifs.  Maybe it is because I've been taking English with Mrs. LaClair for so long, but the flower motif Wilde uses was very clear from the beginning to me.  Though he favors roses, especially when addressing Sybil, he speaks to a wide variety of flowers.  Just the opening scene from the novel speaks to roses, "the heavy scent of lilacs" and "the honey-sweet and honey-colored blossoms of a laburnum," (5).   Lord Henry connects flowers to immortality in a way, as he explains to Dorian while sitting in the garden, that all the flowers around them will grow again next year, and the year after that.  Though flowers are entwined throughout the story, it is evident that Sybil is always compared to a rose. Almost every sentence to describe her actions or beauty use roses.  To describe a simple blush of Sybil's cheeks, Wilde uses the phrase, "a rose shook in her blood and shadowed her cheeks.  Quick breath parted the petals of her lips," (62).  I find that Sybil is connected to a rose because of her youth, as she is just seventeen.  Even after her death, Dorian proclaims that even though he essentially murdered her, "the roses are not less lovely for that," (99).  It seems to me that the fact that the rose was not less lovely was because Sybil was still young even in death.  The flower motif I believe Wilde uses to speak towards the importance of youth to the characters, and I feel as if it will grow to mean even more further on in the story.

Also, a quick update on the story as I didn't really speak much to the plot besides Sybil's death, but Dorian's painting has changed since Sybil's death.  Mostly it was his cruelty towards Sybil that caused a change in the painting's expression.  Just thought I should let you all know that little bit of information.

5 comments:

  1. Hannah, I enjoy the point you make about the motifs with flowers. This is an interesting idea by the author to have flowers represent immortality, because flowers die but then always come back to life during the spring. Is there a character or an event in the story that contains immortality?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Glad I've impacted your reading so much that you notice motifs with ease. Are they always flowers, though? I suppose there have been a lot of flowers this year. Interesting how many different meanings they can have, even though all relate in some way to life.

    Good discussion of style. I wonder if you think that use of the Shakespearean allusions in any way is commenting on the role of art, or certain kinds of art?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you mentioned the writing techniques of authors in this era. While reading Frankenstein this summer I also became appreciative of the long flowing sentences. Do you think the author purposefully makes this distention of style in text and dialogue, and if so, why?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Greetings Hannah "Hannah Bassett" Bassett!
    I enjoyed this blog post very much and appreciate you writing it. The idea of motifs being riddled throughout the book (and being easily noticed thanks to our rigorous training by Mrs. LaClair) is always central to the main theme or themes of the work as a whole, so I think you catching the flower details will help you understand this book a lot more. That along with the numerous drama and theater allusions and extended metaphors make this piece of literature sound very entertaining and beautifully crafted. In "The Idiot," I have not been as lucky to spot any motifs, but it might just be my lazy eyes! There are allusions to past works of literature, but there is not much in the way of style by Mr. Dostoyevsky. He is very punctual and just writes everything to the point, not wasting time on anything that makes the novel more understandable. You must forgive my sharp tongue as I describe my difficulties! The important thing is that this blog post is wonderfully done and if you keep this up, I sense a bright future.
    Happy reading,
    Kenny Andrew

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Hannah, I can really relate to your struggle when it comes to reading Harry's dialogue, and I like how you compared his speech to that of an American president.

    ReplyDelete